Ring of Fire Deadlock Exposes Global Reality for Mine Projects

Strong opinions about the proposed “Ring of Fire” development in the James Bay lowlands of northern Ontario dominated the keynote session at the PDAC conference in Toronto in early March, but there was hardly an audience to hear them.

Although the conference drew more than 25,000 attendees, most of the seats in the giant theatre were empty during the keynote, suggesting investors have tired of hearing about the $60 billion worth of minerals that seem destined to remain in the ground indefinitely, or at least until government, industry and First Nations groups agree on a way to mine them.

The deadlock was perhaps best illustrated by Natural Resources Canada Minister Joe Oliver’s reluctance to actively participate in the “smudge” ceremony at the opening of the conference, a cleansing ritual practised by most First Nations that is meant to sweep away negative energy and emotions. 

Still, the complex issues affecting the Ring of Fire are becoming more relevant to resource developments across Canada and throughout the world. Aboriginal and community groups are more powerful then ever before and mining projects will simply not proceed without their blessing.

“This is a systemic problem which the world is addressing in a variety of ways,” said Bob Rae, former Ontario premier and lead negotiator for the Matawa Tribal Council that represents aboriginals in the Ring of Fire. “The challenge of social responsibility, transparency, accountability and inclusion is not simply an Ontario challenge or a Canadian challenge, it’s a challenge worldwide.”

In Canada, the Supreme Court has determined that there is a duty to consult First Nations about resource projects, but has left it up to governments and First Nations to negotiate what that duty means. This has led to a string of legal battles nationwide, with First Nations groups emerging mostly victorious.

The Ring of Fire is complicated by its location within the province of Ontario, where treaties with First Nations were signed more than a century ago. Provinces that did not have treaties, such as Quebec and British Columbia, are much further ahead in their resource partnerships because they started negotiations with a clean slate, said Rae.

The poverty, health problems and social dysfunction endemic in First Nations communities are added challenges because it’s difficult for leaders to focus on resource negotiations when their communities have no running water, or their youth are committing suicide.

But the image of the disenfranchised aboriginal is no longer relevant, argued Bill Gallagher, who served as a strategist to the Voisey’s Bay Nickel Company when the nickel miner was forging native impact and benefits agreements in Newfoundland & Labrador.  On the contrary, he told the audience that First Nations groups are “riding a winning streak” with a power over resource development that industry underestimates at its peril.

“Whoever aligns with the aboriginals will have the most control in determining development of a project,” Gallagher said. “They have fundamentally reordered the legal underpinnings of the review process for resource projects.”

Global Mining Finance 2014

Several factors conspired to make 2013 one of the worst years in recent memory for North American mining companies. Metal prices fell, led by gold with a 28% decline, while costs for labour, energy and steel continued to rise. Geopolitical risks escalated as jurisdictions erected legal and regulatory roadblocks to development or imposed higher taxes and royalties on production. Investors fled the sector, spooked by massive project writedowns and suspensions, while remaining shareholders rebelled by ousting senior management, especially in the gold space.

The resulting disruption of the flow of projects from junior explorers to mid-tier and senior producers quelled merger and acquisition activity. Seniors attempted to sell off non-core assets but, without a market among their peers, were forced to take some projects off the block. Juniors companies found it next to impossible to raise money on the equity markets as investors clung to projects with imminent cash flow or abandoned the sector altogether.

Signs of life for M&A

Global Mining Finance 2014.jpg

Global merger and acquisition activity in the mining sector fell 31% in the first half of 2013, according to PwC, and the third quarter looked equally sluggish. But towards the end of the year there were signs that the beleaguered junior sector was beginning to consolidate in the interests of survival.

Among other smaller deals, Primero Mining agreed to buy Brigus Gold to create a mid-tier gold producer based in the Americas. The all stock transaction, valued at about $200 mn, combines Brigus’s Black Fox gold mine in Ontario and Goldfields project in Saskatchewan with Primero’s operations in Mexico to produce about 250,000 oz. gold per year.

Likewise, Mercator Minerals agreed to be swallowed by Russia’s Intergeo MMC to create a growing copper miner that will combine the Mineral Park mine in Arizona and the El Pilar project in Mexico with Intergeo’s Ak-Sug copper project in Siberia. The deal signals an end to Intergeo’s attempts to launch an IPO on the TSX in an unreceptive market.

And long-time neighbours Asanko Gold and PMI Gold plan to merge in an all-share deal valued at $183 mn to create a mid-tier gold company operating in Ghana with the potential to produce 400,000 oz. annually.

 “There is more activity on the smaller scale, but it will take a little longer for the monster assets to get digested by the market,” says Allan Fordyce, managing director of investment banking for BNP Paribas.

Small companies acquire major assets

Most of the senior producers have lost interest in acquiring assets because they are under pressure from shareholders to clean up balance sheets and boost profitability. Gold producers in particular are looking inward after an annual decline in the S&P/TSX global gold index of 48% that far exceeded the 28% drop in gold prices.

“The only company in a really good position to buy is Teck, because it has a solid balance sheet and cash flow,” says Fordyce. On the contrary, many of Teck’s peers are selling non-core assets to smaller companies with access to capital and lower overheads.

In April, for instance, BHP Copper Inc., a subsidiary of BHP Billiton, sold the Pinto Valley copper mine in Arizona to Capstone Mining for US$650 mn. The transaction, financed by two $200 mn loans from Scotiabank, gives Capstone its third mine as it strives to become an intermediate copper producer.

Similarly, Rio Tinto Nickel, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, sold the high grade Eagle mine in northern Michigan to Lundin Mining for US$325 mn. The deal, also financed by bank loans, gives Lundin an underground nickel-copper mine in a low risk jurisdiction to add to its base metal operations in Portugal, Sweden and Spain.

Sherritt International, meanwhile, sold its portfolio of coal and potash royalties to Newfoundland-based Altius Minerals Corp. for $481 mn and a suite of coal mines in Alberta and Saskatchewan to Colorado-based Westmoreland Coal for $465 mn.

And Newmont Mining is selling the Midas gold mine and mill in Nevada to Klondex Mines for US$83 mn. The acquisition, financed by a combination a $35 mn package from royalty company Franco-Nevada, a $35 mn private placement of subscription receipts and a $25 mn private placement of secured notes, will complement Klondex’s nearby Fire Creek project.

“These deals are indicative of just how much pressure the large majors are under to improve their balance sheets and profitability by walking away from or monetizing non-core assets,” says Mark Zastre national leader of Grant Thorton’s mining sector. “We’ll see more of these acquisitions by smaller companies, possibly financed in non-traditional ways.”

Junior financings plummet, TSX salvaged by Barrick

Financings for juniors on the Toronto Venture Exchange (TSX-V) fell to just over one billion dollars for the year to November 30, an 80% decline from the same period in 2011, when financings reached $5.5 bn, and less than half of what was raised for the first 11 months of 2012.

“Over the past year or two, investors have become more risk averse and as a result they have moved into other sectors,” says Orlee Wertheim, head of mining business development for the TMX Group. “Fewer financings are being done by early stage exploration companies, which make up a large part of the mining companies on the TSX-V, and the financings that do happen are smaller in terms of dollar amount. Companies don’t want to dilute their shareholders any more than they have to.”

One prerequisite for substantial financing on the TSX-V this year was access to a project that generates, or is about to generate, cash flow. The largest financings were completed by SantaCruz Silver Mining ($40.4 mn), owner of one producing mine (Rosario) and two advanced-stage projects in Mexico; Corsa Coal ($31 mn), a Toronto-based company with operations in the U.S. Appalachian coal belt; and Atico Mining ($19.4 mn), which recently purchased the El Roble copper-gold mine in Colombia.

There were only six mining IPOs on the TSX-V in the first 11 months of 2013, compared with 38 at the same time in 2012. Of those new listings, five were companies with projects in Canada while one (Aurania Resources) had a gold project in Switzerland.

“The companies that are getting financed typically have projects in more stable jurisdictions,” says Wertheim. “We’re seeing a trend towards financings for projects in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions where there is a good rule of law and companies have some certainty of title, taxes and royalties.”

Financings on the senior exchange, the TSX, were more stable, falling 23% from the $6.9 bn raised during the same period last year. However, a single US$3 bn bought deal financing completed by Barrick Gold late in the year skewed the numbers.

Barrick’s massive financing, though scorned by shareholders, was enough to vault mining back into first place for equity capital raised by sectors within the TMX Group, ahead of real estate ($5.2 bn), oil and gas ($4.6 bn) and financial services ($4.4 bn). Other major raises included secondary offerings by Platinum Group Metals ($180 mn), Detour Gold ($176 mn), Allied Nevada Gold ($154 mn), and Guyana Goldfields ($100 mn).

Predictions that hundreds of companies would lose their listings this year as they ran out of cash did not come true. There were 67 delistings of mining companies on the TSX and TSX-V in first 11 months of the year. Of those, 35 were the result of M&A, 20 were at the request of the companies themselves and only 12 were removed because they did not meet listing requirements, according to Wertheim.

But the overall market capitalization of the sector has fallen dramatically, from $481 bn in late 2011 to $225 bn, as investors sold off mining equities in the wake of falling commodity prices, underperforming projects, missed deadlines and moves towards resource nationalization in several jurisdictions where North American companies operate.

The S&P/TSX Venture composite index, the bellwether of the junior sector, hovered just above 900 towards year end, off 24% over 12 months. The index reached a peak of 2440 in March 2011 and has been in steady decline ever since.

CNSX aims to take advantage of carnage

A smaller but less expensive exchange may attract some of the juniors. The Toronto-based CNSX has only a tenth of the listings of the TSX-V, but recent injections of capital may give the tiny bourse the traction it needs to compete seriously for mining listings.

Over the past year, both Dundee Corp.’s Ned Goodman and Caldwell Financial founder Thomas Caldwell have purchased significant stakes in the CNSX and are actively promoting the exchange as home for mining companies who want cheaper listing and filing fees and less red tape.

“I have been impressed for some time with CNSX’s approach to helping entrepreneurs access the public capital markets in Canada,” said Goodman at the time of the investment. “The CNSX model reduces the time and expense companies face in going public, and in maintaining a listing, along with a high level of continuous disclosure.”

Private equity: will it fill some of the void?

Meanwhile, mining bargains are proving too attractive to resist for the traditionally conservative private equity sector. At mid-year, Toronto-based Brookfield Capital Partners provided a $130 mn loan to North American Palladium (NAP) for the expansion of NAP’s Lac des Iles mine in Ontario, while Calgary-based Matco gave Yellowhead Mining an $8 mn convertible loan to continue work on the Harper Creek copper-gold-silver project in south-central British Columbia.

Larger U.S. equity firms, including Apollo Global Management, Blackstone Group and Caralyle Group continue to circle the sector, though none have announced a deal on the scale of TPG Capital’s $500 mn investment in X2 Resources, a new company run by former Xstrata CEO that is planning to build itself into a mid-tier diversified producer.

Closer to the riskier end of the spectrum, Toronto-based Minvest Partners is considering advanced exploration projects that can purchased cheaply, upgraded over a few years, then sold to producers.

Companies such as metals trader RK mine finance, part of the Red Kite Group, are also offering a range of financing to junior and mid-cap mining companies. For example, Asanko Gold secured $150 mn from RK for its Esaase gold project through a combination of debt and off-take financing.

But there has been more talk than action with respect to private equity investments in the mining sector. Although some firms have recruited ex-CEOs for their expertise, their overall ability to professionally vet projects remains limited.

“I’m still sceptical,” says Zastre. “Private equity has traditionally been more involved in oil and gas than mining because mining is so cyclical and it’s much harder to predict when cash flow will be realized.”

Major development projects, major headaches

One of the more disturbing trends to emerge in 2013 was the failure by the industry to deliver new projects. “Several major deposits have come to a halt because of geopolitical risk, cost escalations for labour, steel and energy and the infrastructure requirements for remote projects,” says Miranda Werstiuk, vice president of IBK Capital.

The biggest disappointment was Pascua Lama, the massive gold mine on the border of Chile and Argentina that Barrick Gold has spent US$5.4 bn to develop. Barrick shelved the project indefinitely in October, citing lower gold prices as well as legal and regulatory obstacles imposed by the Chilean government. Other suspensions include:

  • Goldcorp’s $3.9 bn El Morro gold-copper mine, now dormant while the Chilean government considers an appeal by indigenous communities that say they were not properly consulted about the project.

  • Kinross Gold’s Fruta del Norte gold project, purchased for US$1 bn in 2008 but abandoned this year after Kinross failed to reach an agreement with the Ecuadorean government on the terms of a windfall tax.

  • Colossus Minerals’ technically complex Serra Pelada gold project in Brazil, put on care and maintenance after a last ditch financing attempt with Arias Resources Capital Management failed. Colossus, once a junior market darling that soared to $8 per share in 2011, opened 2014 trading at seven cents. 

  • Cliffs Natural Resources $3 bn Black Thor chromite project in northern Canada, suspended indefinitely because of uncertain timelines and the risks associated with developing infrastructure.

Outlook

There doesn’t appear to be any relief forthcoming as 2014 unfolds and new supplies of copper, nickel and gold start entering the market.  “I think it’s going to get worse before it gets better. There will be more companies that walk away from projects, delist or get acquired,” says Zastre. “We won’t be through the worst of it until we have a gold price that everyone is comfortable with.”

But the inability of several companies to make money at current precious metal prices suggests a bottom may not be too far off for the gold producers. Fordyce argues that at total sustaining costs of $1000 per oz. or more, gold does not have much room to drop without a major cut in production “We’re probably close to bottom and its not going to get much worse” he says.

For the base metal sector, Fordyce is optimistic in the longer term because the economies of both the United States and parts of Europe are finally beginning to brighten. He says tapering of the bond buying program in the US – a signal that the feds are less worried about economic prospects - could have a positive impact on base metal prices.

As for M&A, he says 2014 is going to be a lot more active than 2013. “I think you are going to see much more consolidation on the junior level,” he says.

Junior Sector Quickly Running Out of Cash

Although the PDAC convention drew more than 30,000 registrants from 125 countries to its 81st convention – about the same number as the record set last year – there was speculation that for some juniors, the 2013 gathering may be their last.

According to independent U.S. analyst John Kaiser, roughly 20% of the 527 junior companies registered for the PDAC have less than $200,000 in the bank, enough to maintain an office for a few more months, but not nearly sufficient to finance exploration. He warned that the flight of equity capital has undermined the value of junior projects so severely that the sector is vulnerable to takeovers by cash-rich foreign entities. 

“There’s going to be a massive binging buyout, maybe by the Chinese, of ounces and pounds in the ground,” he said at an international panel luncheon on March 5th where the fate of the junior sector was debated.

Equity investors averse to risk and disappointed by the progress of several gold projects are abandoning the sector, resulting in a 20% drop in the value of the S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index – the bellwether of the junior mining sector – in 2012. Even though commodity prices remain robust, only juniors with the most advanced projects are able to turn to the stock market for cash.

As a result, a 3-year boom in exploration that took spending to record levels of $21.5 billion globally in 2012 is likely to come to a halt this year, according to a special report on exploration trends by the SNL Metal Economics Group, even though the research group expects spending by producers to remain steady.

“Due to the limits imposed by ongoing market volatility, the size and scope of many junior budgets remain dependant on investor interest over the first few months of 2013,” the report concludes. “We forecast that the junior sector as a whole will spend less than in 2012….”

Because gold accounts for more than 50% of global exploration spending, one factor that could revive the junior sector is a rising gold price. Although the price dropped below the US$1600 per oz. level recently as investors became more optimistic about global economic conditions, all three panellists at the international panel luncheon –Kaiser and financiers Eric Sprott and Ned Goodman – expect gold to continue its multi-year ascent in 2013.

Sprott, who oversees about $10 billion in investments as CEO of Sprott Asset Management, estimates that for every 10% move in the price of gold, gold stocks respond with a 20-30% adjustment. That correlation has damaged the sector so far in 2013 as gold has tracked downward, but could just as easily buoy gold stocks if momentum shifts to the positive.

“I’m buying gold stocks everyday,” agrees Goodman, president and CEO of Dundee Corporation.  “Gold is real money, a hedge against the stupidity of the markets.”

Meanwhile, expect much more consolidation in the junior sector as companies pool their cash and assets to survive, and more joint ventures as miners try to “derisk” their projects, said PricewaterhouseCoopers' John Nyholt in a special session on financing in volatile markets.

Miners grapple with uncertainty at PDAC Conference

Where are metal prices heading? What will the development landscape look like in a decade? How will the industry cope with a growing labour shortage? These are just a few of the questions speakers attempted to answer at the PDAC’s keynote session on “dealing with uncertainty.”

The most important driver of the industry is metal prices. When they are robust, as they are today, so is the mining sector. When they drop, exploration is the first to suffer, followed by development projects. If the rout lasts long enough, mines begin to close. But even though metals have come off 11% from their near-term highs in April 2011, Scotiabank’s Patricia Mohr doesn’t see a significant downturn in the foreseeable future.

The reason is the Chinese economy. Although Mohr expects growth rates in China to drop below 9% after averaging 9.6% per annum for the past four years, she is confident that the Chinese will engineer a soft landing.

Mohr is also encouraged by signs of life in the U.S. economy, including car manufacturing as Americans replace their aging vehicles with more fuel-efficient models. “I'm optimistic that we are close to a near-term bottom (in commodity prices),” she told conference delegates.

Although demand for metals should remain strong, it is becoming more challenging for miners to find and develop deposits to supply that demand. It costs twice as much to find an ounce of gold as it did in the 1990s, and an average of 14 years to develop those ounces, according to Michael Chender, founder of Halifax-based Metal Economics Group. Copper miners are even worse off: development costs have more than doubled in the past five years, while the period from discovery to construction can stretch to 20 years.

With costs, permitting times, and taxes and royalties all on the upswing, Chender predicts that the rate of conversion of significant gold deposits (greater than 2 mn ounces) into mines – about 60% historically – will fall by 4% per year. “It’s a gentler slope for copper, but it’s still in the wrong direction, especially in light of the projections for growing demand, ” he says.

The challenge is exacerbated by a growing global shortage of skilled workers, the second biggest risk factor for the mining sector according to accounting firm Ernst & Young. In Canada, one third of the mining work force is eligible to retire by 2016, even as $140 billion in new mining projects are proposed. 

One of the solutions to this human resources challenge is to develop standards and certification for some of the most difficult-to-fill positions, including diamond drillers and underground miners, says Ryan Montpellier, executive director of Canada’s Mining Industry Human Resources Council. 

Another is to change the perception of an industry considered “unskilled and brute force” to one that is highly-skilled (for example, 80% of workers in the mineral exploration sector have some form of post secondary education while 50% have a university degree).

In the end, higher prices won’t mean much if there is a scarcity of both deposits and the workers that can find and develop them.

Junior Exchange Could Become World Leader if it Plays it's Cards Right

The formation of a national junior exchange would allow Canada to become a world leader in electronic trading of resource stocks under the right circumstances, say observers.

“If the Canadian exchange turns out to be a very efficient, order-driven, electronic execution system and if it has a decent regulatory system in place, I think a lot of the more legitimate companies would want to list there,” says John Kaiser, editor of the California-based Kaiser Bottom Fishing Report.  “It could become one of the most liquid gambling machines in the world for resource stocks.”

Canadian stock exchanges are known worldwide for their mine financing capabilities, but their credibility has suffered as a result of recent scandals such as Cartaway Resources, Timbuktu Gold and the infamous Bre-X fiasco.

Under the restructuring proposal for Canada’s securities industry announced in March, the Vancouver and Alberta exchanges will merge with Toronto’s Canadian Dealing Network. Junior companies currently listed on the Montreal Exchange and the Winnipeg Stock Exchange have also been invited to join the group.

The restructuring will make the Toronto Stock Exchange Canada’s only senior equities exchange, while Montreal will take over options and futures trading.

The new junior exchange will be similar to NASDAQ in the United States, but a lot smaller and – at least initially - more heavily weighted by resource companies rather than high-tech stocks.  It will be based in either Calgary or Vancouver and maintain offices in Montreal and Toronto.

Michael Johnson, president and CEO of the VSE, says creating a specialized market with uniform regulation will improve the ability of Canadian juniors to compete internationally and attract more institutional investment.

Some dispute this claim, arguing that the merger is little more than a cost-saving measure for the exchanges and their members that will have little impact on the listed companies.

“There are definite advantages to the merger from the point of view of efficiency. But it’s not going to increase liquidity, “ says John Woods, editor of Canada Stockwatch.

And Canada’s position as the world capital of exploration financing may well be lost rather than enhanced if exchange officials do not take advantage of the restructuring to increase accessibility to retail investors, Kaiser says. He argues that both speculative investors and junior listings will move south of the border in search of better liquidity and a larger audience, leaving the new exchange to wither.

“The whole thing clearly must become much more electronic,” concurs Gerald Harper, president of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada. “It should be almost as easy as phoning up and asking to rent a terminal for the junior exchange in, for example, Thunder Bay.”

Officials from the ASE and VSE say the new exchange will be fully electronic but that providing online trading for retail investors will not be on the agenda at anytime in the foreseeable future.

“We’re looking to provide, through the merger, improved access to trading for our members. But providing on-line access to trading for investors is not currently part of the consideration,” said a VSE spokesman.

Tom Cumming, president of the ASE, said the new exchange’s first priority will be to foster a reputation for the quality of its listed companies, its regulation and its management.

But regardless of the ultimate direction, the creation of a new junior exchange is facing a number of hurdles.

There is some resistance to the restructuring in Quebec, where an advisory committee is reviewing the proposed changes and ME-listed juniors have voiced concerns about losing credibility from an affiliation with the Western exchanges, where recent scams like Bre-X originated.

“Montreal must have a branch office with the power to make decisions and the board of directors (of the junior exchange) must include representatives from the Montreal exchange,’ says Guy Parent, president  of the Quebec Prospectors Association.

The VSE’s lingering reputation as the “scam capital of the world”, a designation assigned by Forbes magazine about a decade ago, also hangs like a dark cloud over the merger.

“Moving the exchange to Calgary is the easiest way to bring closure to that unhappy time,” says Woods.

Another thorny question is how to police a national exchange when each province has its own independent securities regulator. Although the possibility of forming a national securities commission in Canada has been discussed for years, there has been little progress towards this goal.

Meanwhile, the very companies the new exchange is hoping to serve – junior resource stocks - are mired in the worst bear market this decade. Low commodity prices and the lingering effects of  Bre-X on investor sentiment have turned many high-flying exploration stocks into worthless shells. The barometer of the junior mining sector, the VSE Composite Index, sits at the 425 level, down from about 1500 in early 1997.

Until these stocks become more attractive to investors, the new national exchange will have little clout either domestically or internationally.